ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE LEADERS RESPOND TO U.S. EPA PLAN TO <\/b>RECONSIDER EMISSIONS FROM EXISTING GAS PLANTS IN SUPPLEMENTAL RULEMAKING<\/b><\/p>\r\n
NATIONAL (February 29, 2024) – Today leaders within the environmental justice movement responded to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency plan to tackle emissions from existing gas plants in a supplemental rulemaking to the <\/span>\u201cNew Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Fossil Fuel\u2013Fired Electric Generating Units (EGU); Emissions Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Fossil Fuel\u2013Fired Electric Generating Units<\/span><\/i>.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\r\n \u201cWe are pleased to learn that EPA Administrator Michael Regan and the White House are responding to our individual and collective concerns about the treatment of existing gas plants in the current iteration of its carbon rule proposal. Our organizations have repeatedly sounded an alarm about the lack of environmental justice analysis and cumulative impacts considerations in the proposal, and we see this reconsideration as an important step for allowing a more thoughtful and comprehensive plan for regulating this critical segment of the power sector.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\r\n We strongly believe that climate pollution mitigation and environmental justice for communities go hand in hand. Any rulemaking to address the existing gas sector can and must achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gasses while also<\/span> improving<\/span><\/i> local air quality and the public health of overburdened communities. In addition, a supplemental rulemaking for existing gas plants opens up the possibility of considering a diverse range of policy and practice options, from multiple sources within the Federal family, to improve pollution mitigation and environmental justice outcomes and to respond to the climate crisis.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\r\n Our request is that the EPA have a clear timeline and transparent process for proposing and implementing a supplemental rulemaking for existing gas plants as we are prepared to work collaboratively with the Agency on this new phase.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\r\n Signatories:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\r\n Peggy Shepard, Co-Founder and Executive Director of WE ACT for Environmental Justice stated,<\/b><\/p>\r\n \u201cWe are pleased to see that the voices and considerations of environmental justice communities are being factored into this monumentally impactful area of environmental rulemaking. The EPA has a responsibility to our communities and to our future – the power sector is one of the top sources of carbon emissions and pollution – we have a limited amount of time to not only create an energy transition but also to do it the right way with clean and renewable sources and communities in mind. With this pause to take a deeper dive into developing the most comprehensive and thoughtful rulemaking for existing gas plants, we have an opportunity to do this work correctly and effectively to protect the human and environmental health of the most overburdened, neglected, and vulnerable people across the country – which in turn benefits everyone. We are wholly appreciative of the EPA\u2019s leadership in demonstrating the need for further review, and at the same time request a clear and transparent process as we look forward to collaborating for its improved realization. Only when this rule is finalized can we truly know we are on a path to resilience and justice. Our movement being recognized and included in the EPA\u2019s process will indeed create a world in which we don\u2019t have to dare to breathe, but instead live and breathe more easily today and tomorrow.\u201d Dr. Ana Baptista, Co-Director of the Tishman Environment & Design Center at The New School and Associate Professor at The New School University shared,<\/b><\/p>\r\n “US EPA\u2019s decision to address existing natural gas plants in a supplemental rulemaking process is a critical opportunity to take up the substantive environmental justice concerns voiced by communities in the comment period. A large majority of natural gas plants contribute to the existing, disproportionate burdens already faced by environmental justice communities. This decision allows for a more comprehensive approach to tackling both climate change and the cumulative impacts that these plants pose to overburdened communities.”\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\r\n <\/p>\r\n Dr. Nicky Sheats, Ph.D, MPP, Esq., Director, Center for the Urban Environment at the John S. Watson Institute for Urban Policy and Research at Kean University shared,<\/b><\/p>\r\n \u201cIn addition to fighting climate change, climate change mitigation policy should be used to improve the health of communities by improving local air quality. Re-considering the portion of the power plants rule that applies to existing natural gas plants will provide EPA with more opportunity to ensure that overburdened environmental justice communities are not sacrificed as the nation fights climate change. We need to make sure the rule does, in fact, improve local air quality in these communities and does not make it worse.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\r\n \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\r\n Dr. Beverly Wright, Founder and Executive Director of the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice stated,<\/b><\/p>\r\n \u201cWe are grateful to have EPA\u2019s leadership to reduce power plant pollution in a way that is protective of nearby communities. Power plants are disproportionately located near Black and other communities of color, and release massive amounts of pollution that cause asthma and contribute to climate change. Allowing these existing plants to employ carbon capture and storage or hydrogen co-firing would increase health risks and set back progress on renewable energy. We look forward to participating in regulations for existing power plants that advance environmental and climate justice.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\r\n <\/p>\r\n Dr. Robert D. Bullard<\/b>, <\/span>Distinguished Professor of Urban Planning and Environmental Policy and Director of the Bullard Center for Environmental and Climate Justice at Texas Southern University stated,<\/b><\/p>\r\n “We applaud EPA for taking an important step toward mitigating pollution from the fossil fuel power generation sector, and we implore the agency to go further down this path.\u00a0 Curtailing pollution is of the utmost urgency as communities of color and low-wealth struggle under the weight of historical and continued pollution and injustice.\u00a0 We call on the EPA to continue enacting anti-racist policies that result in real justice for real people. We don\u2019t need any false solutions like hydrogen and carbon capture that will add to the pollution burden that already exists in our communities.\u00a0 Instead, we need only those solutions that improve environmental conditions for the most vulnerable people.” Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Jr.<\/b>,<\/span> President and CEO, Hip Hop Caucus shared,<\/b><\/p>\r\n “The rule as proposed did not address the concerns of environmental justice communities. Therefore, it is encouraging to see the EPA and Biden Administration pause to reflect on environmental justice needs rather than push out regulations that do not address the climate crisis, as it is a racial justice matter. We look forward to continuing to engage on this existing gas plant rule and others to ensure community concerns are uplifted and harmful impacts are addressed.\u201d<\/p>\r\n <\/span><\/p>\r\n Maria Lopez-Nu\u00f1ez<\/b>,<\/span> Deputy Director, Organizing and Advocacy,\u00a0 Ironbound Community Corporation shared,\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\r\n “Environmental Justice communities can breathe a little bit easier with this delay in the release of the \u2018<\/span>New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Fossil Fuel\u2013Fired Electric Generating Units (EGU); Emissions Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Fossil Fuel\u2013Fired Electric Generating Units<\/span><\/i>.\u2019<\/span> We are hopeful that this delay will allow a reconsideration that fully embraces Environmental Justice in order to ensure healthy outcomes for our communities.” Melissa Miles<\/b>,<\/span> Executive Director, New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance stated,<\/b><\/p>\r\n \u201cDelaying the existing natural gas plants part of the power plants rule will give EPA a better opportunity to make sure the rule helps environmental justice communities in their fight to improve local air quality. There needs to be protections in the rule to ensure that environmental justice communities already overburdened by air pollution are not further burdened by this rule.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\r\n <\/p>\r\n Byron Gudiel, Executive Director at Center for Earth Energy and Democracy (CEED) shared,<\/b><\/p>\r\n “We know that overwhelmingly the burden of pollution from fossil fuel powered power plants is borne by low income communities, communities of color and indigenous communities. We also know that the impacts of rising intensive heat cycles, extreme temperatures and the resulting power outages are experienced most acutely by environmental justice communities. We are pleased to learn that EPA Administrator Michael Regan and the White House are responding to our individual and collective EJ concerns about the treatment of existing gas plants. We are at a critical juncture in our nation’s history and we hope the Administration meets the challenge of climate change in ways that center environmental justice communities.”<\/span><\/p>\r\n <\/p>\r\n MEDIA CONTACTS:<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\nQUOTES FROM LEADERS<\/h3>\r\n
\r\n<\/span><\/p>\r\n
\r\n<\/span><\/p>\r\n
\r\n<\/span>
\r\n<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n